| Title |
On the ‘students as surrogates’ research conundrum: Insights from statistical reasoning in revenue management
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management, June 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1057/rpm.2015.16 |
| Authors |
Chih-Chien Chen, Zvi Schwartz, Xiaojuan Jady Yu |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 9 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 9 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 3 | 33% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 2 | 22% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 22% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 June 2015.
All research outputs
#21,500,020
of 24,003,070 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management
#132
of 140 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#229,714
of 270,130 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Revenue and Pricing Management
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,003,070 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 140 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,130 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.