↓ Skip to main content

Use of benzodiazepines and cardiovascular mortality in a cohort of women aged over 50 years

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
Title
Use of benzodiazepines and cardiovascular mortality in a cohort of women aged over 50 years
Published in
European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00228-018-2515-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sylvie Mesrine, Gaëlle Gusto, Françoise Clavel-Chapelon, Marie-Christine Boutron-Ruault, Agnès Fournier

Abstract

To assess the association between use of benzodiazepines (including the Z-drugs zopiclone and zolpidem) and cardiovascular mortality in women aged over 50 years. We used data from the E3N cohort. Data self-reported in biennial questionnaires was matched with drug reimbursement and vital status/causes of death data. In Cox models, exposure to benzodiazepines was fitted using time-varying variables, the reference category being women with no benzodiazepine delivery since January 2004. Among 85,353 women born 1925-1950 and followed between 2004 and 2011, 506 cardiovascular deaths occurred. Exposure to benzodiazepines was associated with increased cardiovascular mortality when hazard ratios (HRs) were adjusted only for age (HRever use 1.65; 95% CI 1.39, 1.97), but not when further adjusted for antidepressant use (HRever use 1.15; 95% CI 0.94, 1.40), nor in the multivariable model (HRever use 0.93; 95% CI 0.75, 1.16). Exposure to hypnotic benzodiazepines remained associated with increased cardiovascular mortality (HRever use 1.23; 95% CI 1.01, 1.51), but with no consistent trend across duration/dose or time since last use, while exposure to anxiolytic benzodiazepines was not (HRever use 0.83; 95% CI 0.67, 1.02). In our study, adjustment for antidepressant use strongly attenuated any benzodiazepine-cardiovascular mortality association. Whether the modest association observed with hypnotic benzodiazepines is due to residual confounding deserves further investigation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 11 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 18%
Student > Master 2 18%
Professor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Student > Bachelor 1 9%
Other 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 27%
Psychology 2 18%
Neuroscience 1 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 9%
Unknown 4 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2019.
All research outputs
#12,807,625
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#1,811
of 2,574 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,840
of 328,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
#15
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,574 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.