↓ Skip to main content

Perceived body discomfort and trunk muscle activity in three prolonged sitting postures

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Physical Therapy Science, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
31 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
59 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perceived body discomfort and trunk muscle activity in three prolonged sitting postures
Published in
Journal of Physical Therapy Science, July 2015
DOI 10.1589/jpts.27.2183
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pooriput Waongenngarm, Bala S. Rajaratnam, Prawit Janwantanakul

Abstract

[Purpose] This study aimed to investigate the perceived discomfort and trunk muscle activity in three different 1-hour sitting postures. [Subjects] A repeated-measures design study was conducted on 10 healthy subjects. [Methods] Each subject sat for an hour in three sitting postures (i.e., upright, slumped, and forward leaning sitting postures). Subjects rated perceived body discomfort using Borg's CR-10 scale at the beginning and after 1 hour sitting. The electromyographic activity of the trunk muscle activity was recorded during the 1-hour period of sitting. [Results] The forward leaning sitting posture led to higher Borg scores in the low back than those in the upright (p = 0.002) and slumped sitting postures (p < 0.001). The forward leaning posture was significantly associated with increased iliocostalis lumborum pars thoracis (ICL) and superficial lumbar multifidus (MF) muscle activity compared with the upright and slumped sitting postures. The upright sitting posture was significantly associated with increased internal oblique (IO)/transversus abdominis (TrA) and ICL muscle activity compared with the slumped sitting posture. [Conclusion] The sitting posture with the highest low back discomfort after prolonged sitting was the forward leaning posture. Sitting in an upright posture is recommended because it increases IO/TrA muscle activation and induces only relatively moderate ICL and MF muscle activation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 31 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 184 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 40 21%
Student > Bachelor 29 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 9%
Researcher 9 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 4%
Other 30 16%
Unknown 57 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 33 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 32 17%
Engineering 16 9%
Sports and Recreations 14 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Other 20 11%
Unknown 66 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 17. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2021.
All research outputs
#2,188,313
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Physical Therapy Science
#142
of 1,730 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,925
of 276,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Physical Therapy Science
#9
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,730 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.