↓ Skip to main content

2B4 Is Dispensable for T-Dependent B Cell Immune Responses, but Its Deficiency Leads to Enhanced T-Independent Responses Due to an Increase in Peritoneal Cavity B1b Cells

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
2B4 Is Dispensable for T-Dependent B Cell Immune Responses, but Its Deficiency Leads to Enhanced T-Independent Responses Due to an Increase in Peritoneal Cavity B1b Cells
Published in
PLOS ONE, August 2015
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0137314
Pubmed ID
Authors

Avijit Ray, Cheng-Yin Yuan, Nichole M. Miller, Hong Mei, Bonnie N. Dittel

Abstract

The signaling lymphocyte activation molecule (SLAM) family plays important roles in adaptive immune responses. Herein, we evaluated whether the SLAM family member 2B4 (CD244) plays a role in immune cell development, homeostasis and antibody responses. We found that the splenic cellularity in Cd244-/- mice was significantly reduced due to a reduction in both CD4 T cells and follicular (Fo) B cells; whereas, the number of peritoneal cavity B cells was increased. These findings led us to examine whether 2B4 modulates B cell immune responses. When we examined T-dependent B cell responses, while there was no difference in the kinetics or magnitude of the antigen-specific IgM and IgG1 antibody response there was a reduction in bone marrow (BM) memory, but not plasma cells in Cd244-/- mice. When we evaluated T-independent immune responses, we found that antigen-specific IgM and IgG3 were elevated in the serum following immunization. These data indicate that 2B4 dampens T-independent B cell responses due to a reduction in peritoneal cavity B cells, but has minimal impact on T-dependent B cell responses.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 61%
Other 2 11%
Professor 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Immunology and Microbiology 10 56%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Chemistry 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2015.
All research outputs
#20,290,425
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#173,874
of 194,766 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#224,088
of 266,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#5,194
of 5,944 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 194,766 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,944 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.