You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
COMPARING MARINE AND TERRESTRIAL ECOSYSTEMS: IMPLICATIONS FOR THE DESIGN OF COASTAL MARINE RESERVES
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecological Applications, February 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1890/1051-0761(2003)013[0090:cmatei]2.0.co;2 |
| Authors |
Mark H. Carr, Joseph E. Neigel, James A. Estes, Sandy Andelman, Robert R. Warner, John L. Largier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 986 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 20 | 2% |
| Brazil | 13 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | <1% |
| Mexico | 4 | <1% |
| South Africa | 4 | <1% |
| Portugal | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Canada | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Other | 30 | 3% |
| Unknown | 896 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 224 | 23% |
| Researcher | 214 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 161 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 88 | 9% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 45 | 5% |
| Other | 180 | 18% |
| Unknown | 74 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 500 | 51% |
| Environmental Science | 258 | 26% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 45 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 29 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 1% |
| Other | 35 | 4% |
| Unknown | 109 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2015.
All research outputs
#15,915,226
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Ecological Applications
#2,826
of 3,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,773
of 144,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecological Applications
#22
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.4. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 144,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.