↓ Skip to main content

Improving Cross-Sector Comparisons: Going Beyond the Health-Related QALY

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#26 of 794)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
45 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
75 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
105 Mendeley
Title
Improving Cross-Sector Comparisons: Going Beyond the Health-Related QALY
Published in
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s40258-015-0194-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

John Brazier, Aki Tsuchiya

Abstract

The quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) has become a widely used measure of health outcomes for use in informing decision making in health technology assessment. However, there is growing recognition of outcomes beyond health within the health sector and in related sectors such as social care and public health. This paper presents the advantages and disadvantages of ten possible approaches covering extending the health-related QALY and using well-being and monetary-based methods, in order to address the problem of using multiple outcome measures to inform resource allocation within and between sectors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 105 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 102 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 17%
Student > Master 14 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Student > Bachelor 8 8%
Lecturer 5 5%
Other 14 13%
Unknown 33 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 17%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 14 13%
Social Sciences 10 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 7%
Psychology 5 5%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 36 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,000,299
of 23,509,982 outputs
Outputs from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#26
of 794 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,457
of 268,178 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,509,982 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 794 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,178 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.