↓ Skip to main content

Medical Marijuana and Chronic Pain: a Review of Basic Science and Clinical Evidence

Overview of attention for article published in Current Pain and Headache Reports, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#20 of 812)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
14 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
10 Wikipedia pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
98 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
401 Mendeley
Title
Medical Marijuana and Chronic Pain: a Review of Basic Science and Clinical Evidence
Published in
Current Pain and Headache Reports, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11916-015-0524-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bjorn Jensen, Jeffrey Chen, Tim Furnish, Mark Wallace

Abstract

Cannabinoid compounds include phytocannabinoids, endocannabinoids, and synthetics. The two primary phytocannabinoids are delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and cannabidiol (CBD), with CB1 receptors in the brain and peripheral tissue and CB2 receptors in the immune and hematopoietic systems. The route of delivery of cannabis is important as the bioavailability and metabolism are very different for smoking versus oral/sublingual routes. Gold standard clinical trials are limited; however, some studies have thus far shown evidence to support the use of cannabinoids for some cancer, neuropathic, spasticity, acute pain, and chronic pain conditions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 401 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Italy 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Puerto Rico 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 396 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 65 16%
Researcher 62 15%
Student > Master 51 13%
Other 42 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 9%
Other 81 20%
Unknown 64 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 128 32%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 34 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 7%
Psychology 24 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 5%
Other 89 22%
Unknown 79 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 62. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2022.
All research outputs
#612,651
of 23,545,680 outputs
Outputs from Current Pain and Headache Reports
#20
of 812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,635
of 268,227 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Pain and Headache Reports
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,545,680 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,227 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.