↓ Skip to main content

Nectar Sugar Composition in Relation to Pollination Syndromes in Sinningieae (Gesneriaceae)

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Botany, February 2001
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

facebook
38 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
124 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
380 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nectar Sugar Composition in Relation to Pollination Syndromes in Sinningieae (Gesneriaceae)
Published in
Annals of Botany, February 2001
DOI 10.1006/anbo.2000.1331
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mathieu Perret, Alain Chautems, Rodolphe Spichiger, Mauro Peixoto, Vincent Savolainen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 380 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 27 7%
United States 5 1%
United Kingdom 4 1%
Spain 3 <1%
Japan 2 <1%
Colombia 2 <1%
Mexico 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 328 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 18%
Student > Master 60 16%
Researcher 53 14%
Student > Bachelor 45 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 8%
Other 85 22%
Unknown 36 9%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 257 68%
Environmental Science 42 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 3%
Chemistry 6 2%
Arts and Humanities 3 <1%
Other 18 5%
Unknown 42 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2018.
All research outputs
#2,760,503
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Botany
#816
of 3,723 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,478
of 113,964 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Botany
#2
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,723 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,964 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 7 of them.