↓ Skip to main content

Evolution of the Biosynthetic Pathway for Cyanogenic Glucosides in Lepidoptera

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Molecular Evolution, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
31 Mendeley
Title
Evolution of the Biosynthetic Pathway for Cyanogenic Glucosides in Lepidoptera
Published in
Journal of Molecular Evolution, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00239-018-9854-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mika Zagrobelny, Mikael Kryger Jensen, Heiko Vogel, René Feyereisen, Søren Bak

Abstract

Cyanogenic glucosides are widespread defence compounds in plants, and they are also found in some arthropods, especially within Lepidoptera. The aliphatic linamarin and lotaustralin are the most common cyanogenic glucosides in Lepidoptera, and they are biosynthesised de novo, and/or sequestered from food plants. Their biosynthetic pathway was elucidated in the burnet moth, Zygaena filipendulae, and consists of three enzymes: two cytochrome P450 enzymes, CYP405A2 and CYP332A3, and a glucosyl transferase, UGT33A1. Heliconius butterflies also produce linamarin and lotaustralin and have close homologs to CYP405A2 and CYP332A3. To unravel the evolution of the pathway in Lepidoptera, we performed phylogenetic analyses on all available CYP405 and CYP332 sequences. CYP332 sequences were present in almost all Lepidoptera, while the distribution of CYP405s among butterflies and moths was much more limited. Negative purifying selection was found in both CYP enzyme families, indicating that the biosynthesis of CNglcs is an old trait, and not a newly evolved pathway. We compared CYP405A2 to its close paralog, CYP405A3, which is not involved in the biosynthetic pathway. The only significant difference between these two enzymes is a smaller substrate binding pocket in CYP405A2, which would make the enzyme more substrate specific. We consider it likely that the biosynthetic pathway of CNglcs in butterflies and moths have evolved from a common pathway, perhaps based on a predisposition for detoxifying aldoximes by way of a CYP332. Later the aldoxime metabolising CYP405s evolved, and a UGT was recruited into the pathway to establish de novo biosynthesis of CNglcs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 31 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 13%
Researcher 4 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 11 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 19%
Unspecified 1 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 3%
Chemistry 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2019.
All research outputs
#6,893,974
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#412
of 1,455 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,769
of 328,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#3
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,455 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.