| Title |
A juvenile ankylosaur from China
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Science of Nature, July 2001
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s001140100233 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Xing Xu, Xiao-Lin Wang, Hai-Lu You |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 73 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Chile | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 22% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 12 | 16% |
| Unknown | 9 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 39 | 53% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 27% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 1% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 1% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 10 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 May 2023.
All research outputs
#2,913,822
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from The Science of Nature
#367
of 2,195 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,107
of 39,657 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Science of Nature
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,195 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 39,657 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them