| Title |
Establishing the teratogenicity of Zika and evaluating causal criteria
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Synthese, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11229-018-1866-9 |
| Authors |
Jon Williamson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 1 | 50% |
| United States | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Professor | 2 | 20% |
| Researcher | 2 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 20% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 2 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philosophy | 3 | 30% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 30% |
| Psychology | 1 | 10% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 July 2019.
All research outputs
#3,661,758
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#325
of 2,488 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,119
of 328,026 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#5
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,488 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,026 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.