↓ Skip to main content

Safety of bevacizumab in patients younger than 4 years of age

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical and Translational Oncology, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
18 Mendeley
Title
Safety of bevacizumab in patients younger than 4 years of age
Published in
Clinical and Translational Oncology, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s12094-015-1389-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

N. C. Millan, M. J. Poveda, O. Cruz, J. Mora

Abstract

Limited data exist regarding the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab in pediatric patients under the age of 4 years. Here, we report a large cohort of pediatric patients under 4 years of age treated with bevacizumab. The primary objective was to document adverse events with a possible relationship to bevacizumab. Patients (n = 16) were identified through retrospective chart review and harbored a variety of conditions (44 % central nervous system (CNS) tumors, 31 % vascular anomalies, 13 % neuroblastoma, 12 % other). The median age was 34.3 months (range 4.9-47.3), including five patients <2 years of age. Patients received bevacizumab for a median duration of 6.2 months, alone or with chemotherapy, and a median dose of 9.25 mg/kg (range 7.0-11.8). Partial responses were seen in 19 % of patients, and clinical improvements were seen in 69 %. Adverse events known to be associated with bevacizumab occurred in 37 %. Outcomes observed in this population resemble those reported for bevacizumab in older pediatric patients. The overall pattern and frequency of adverse events observed was similar to those seen in reports of older pediatric patients with a variety of conditions. The highest level of efficacy observed was seen among patients with vascular malformations or with low-grade CNS tumors. Our results suggest that the use of bevacizumab is safe for the youngest children.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 18 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 6%
Unknown 17 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 3 17%
Researcher 2 11%
Student > Master 2 11%
Librarian 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Other 3 17%
Unknown 6 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 39%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Psychology 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 August 2016.
All research outputs
#14,236,953
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Oncology
#594
of 1,305 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,189
of 266,764 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Oncology
#11
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,305 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,764 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.