↓ Skip to main content

Hypertension and Pharmacological Therapy in Women

Overview of attention for article published in High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
10 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
Title
Hypertension and Pharmacological Therapy in Women
Published in
High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40292-018-0257-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elisa Lodi, Alberto Carollo, Valentina Martinotti, Maria Grazia Modena

Abstract

Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality for women all over the world. The role and weight of risk factors in relation to gender are not completely clarified as well as their treatment. Pathophysiology of hypertension in woman presents different aspects in relation to phase of life, with an impact on treatment. The only certainties that we have nowadays regarding hypertension therapy in women are really few and may be summarized in: how to treat or, better, what not to use in hypertension in pregnancy and how to treat acute severe hypertension in pregnancy. We have some certainties also on treatment of hypertension associated to some women's comorbidities. Considering guidelines and analyzing what happens in the real world, we report in this review that women have similar major CV risk factors of men, although a minor CV global risk. However, there are some data that suggest that hypertension and diabetes are more important risk factors in women than in men. Blood pressure reduction and benefit by treatment appear similar in women and men, suggesting that we should aim for similar target of blood pressure, although the lower global risk profile should imply different target. Theoretically, recommended drugs are similar in women and men, but in women we must take in account CV risk profile, comorbidity, side effects, and reproductive health. Finally, registries and observational studies show that fewer women reach the target values of blood pressure and that women receive more frequently prescription of "other" classes of drugs than those recommended by guidelines, even after normalization by age and comorbidities.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 50 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 9 18%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 8%
Other 2 4%
Researcher 2 4%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 23 46%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 6 12%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 8%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 21 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 July 2018.
All research outputs
#17,982,872
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention
#154
of 248 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#239,582
of 329,823 outputs
Outputs of similar age from High Blood Pressure & Cardiovascular Prevention
#5
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 248 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,823 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.