↓ Skip to main content

Variation in vervet (Chlorocebus aethiops) hair cortisol concentrations reflects ecological disturbance by humans

Overview of attention for article published in Primates, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
97 Mendeley
Title
Variation in vervet (Chlorocebus aethiops) hair cortisol concentrations reflects ecological disturbance by humans
Published in
Primates, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10329-015-0486-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicolaas H. Fourie, Trudy R. Turner, Janine L. Brown, James D. Pampush, Joseph G. Lorenz, Robin M. Bernstein

Abstract

Vervet monkeys (Chlorocebus aethiops) often live in close proximity to humans. Vervets are known to raid crops, homes and gardens in suburban areas leading to human-vervet conflict. In general, primate groups with access to human foods experience increased population densities and intra-group aggression. This suggests high stress loads for vervets living in environments with high levels of human habitat disturbance and close proximity to humans. We tested the hypothesis that populations characterized by high levels of human impact are more physiologically stressed than low human impact populations, and that this increased stress would be reflected in higher concentrations of hair cortisol. We predicted that because females would be less likely to engage in high risk foraging activities, and hence keep more distance from humans than males, their hair cortisol levels should be lower than those in males. We quantified cortisol in the hair of wild caught individuals from populations that experienced different degrees of human habitat disturbance and differences in access to human food. We found that males in high human impact groups had significantly higher hair cortisol concentrations than those in low human impact groups, although this difference was not observed in female vervets. Human impacts on vervet behavioral ecology appear to be a significant source of stress for male animals in particular.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 97 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 97 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 26%
Student > Master 17 18%
Student > Bachelor 15 15%
Researcher 4 4%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 4%
Other 12 12%
Unknown 20 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 47 48%
Environmental Science 10 10%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 2%
Other 8 8%
Unknown 23 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2016.
All research outputs
#4,504,599
of 24,837,702 outputs
Outputs from Primates
#294
of 1,059 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,396
of 272,542 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Primates
#10
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,837,702 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,059 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 272,542 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.