↓ Skip to main content

Victim Reports of Bystander Reactions to In-Person and Online Peer Harassment: A National Survey of Adolescents

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Youth and Adolescence, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
6 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
132 Mendeley
Title
Victim Reports of Bystander Reactions to In-Person and Online Peer Harassment: A National Survey of Adolescents
Published in
Journal of Youth and Adolescence, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10964-015-0342-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lisa M. Jones, Kimberly J. Mitchell, Heather A. Turner

Abstract

Bullying prevention is increasingly targeting education to bystanders, but more information is needed on the complexities of bystander actions across a wide variety of incidents, including both online and in-person peer harassment. The current study analyzes victim report data from a nationally representative survey of youth ages 10-20 (n = 791; 51 % female). Bystander presence was common across all harassment incident types (80 % of incidents). In contrast to previous research, our study found that supportive bystander behaviors occurred at relatively high rates. Unfortunately, antagonistic bystander behaviors, although less common, were predictive of higher negative impact for the victim. A large percentage of victims (76 %) also disclosed the harassment to confidants, who play an important role as secondary bystanders. While friends were the most common confidant, incidents were also disclosed to adults at high rates (60 %) and with mostly positive results. The findings suggest that prevention programs could increase their impact by targeting education to both direct witnesses and confidants, and considering a wider variety of peer victimization incident types.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 132 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 131 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 13%
Student > Master 16 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 10%
Researcher 10 8%
Other 20 15%
Unknown 36 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 39 30%
Social Sciences 18 14%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 6%
Computer Science 5 4%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 49 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2021.
All research outputs
#4,810,695
of 23,906,448 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#538
of 1,813 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,371
of 271,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Youth and Adolescence
#8
of 21 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,906,448 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,813 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 21 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.