↓ Skip to main content

Microplastics in the Ocean

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#32 of 2,280)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
23 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
153 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
840 Mendeley
Title
Microplastics in the Ocean
Published in
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00244-015-0216-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Won Joon Shim, Richard C. Thomposon

Abstract

Since their ubiquity in the ocean and marine organisms was first revealed, global concern about microplastics has grown considerably. The North Pacific Ocean and the adjacent marginal seas have high levels of microplastic contamination compared with the global average. This special issue on microplastics was organized by the North Pacific Marine Science Organization to share information on microplastic pollution in the North Pacific region. The special issue highlights high levels of contamination in the North Pacific both on shorelines and at the sea surface. Particularly high levels of contamination were reported on the western and southern coasts of Korea. Sources, including sewage discharge, aquaculture, and shipyards, were implicated. With the direction and energy of surface winds and currents have an important influence on shoreline patterns of distribution. The special issue also demonstrates potential for ingestion of microplastic by small planktonic organisms at the base of the food chain. A wide range of chemicals are associated with plastic debris and concerns are expressed about the potential for these chemicals to transfer to biota upon ingestion. As an introduction to the topic, this paper provides a brief background on microplastic contamination, highlights some key research gaps, and summarizes findings from the articles published in this issue.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 840 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 832 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 186 22%
Student > Master 140 17%
Researcher 82 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 9%
Other 31 4%
Other 101 12%
Unknown 226 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 205 24%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 132 16%
Engineering 47 6%
Chemistry 45 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 42 5%
Other 106 13%
Unknown 263 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 December 2022.
All research outputs
#1,361,701
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#32
of 2,280 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,901
of 280,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#2
of 37 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,280 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,582 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 37 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.