| Title |
Increased amount and duration of tea consumption may be associated with decreased risk of renal stone disease
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Urology, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00345-018-2394-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Hung-Yu Chen, Jin-Shang Wu, Yin-Fan Chang, Zih-Jie Sun, Chih-Jen Chang, Feng-Hwa Lu, Yi-Ching Yang |
| Abstract |
Previous studies have looked into the association between tea consumption and renal stone disease, but the impact of tea consumption over time has not yet been fully clarified. Our study aimed to examine the amount and duration of tea consumption concomitantly in relation to the risk of renal stone disease. A total of 13,842 subjects who underwent health check-ups were recruited. Average tea consumption per day was defined as the amount of tea consumption per day multiplied by the frequency per week divided by seven. A "cup" was defined as 120 mL for each Chinese traditional teapot," and "cup-year" was calculated by multiplying the number of daily cups and the years of tea consumption to express the cumulative dose of tea consumption over time. The diagnosis of renal stone disease was established based on the results of abdominal sonography. The amount of daily tea consumption was 119.2 ± 306.8 and 131.7 ± 347.3 mL in groups with and without renal stone disease. After adjusting for other clinical variables, daily tea consumption ≥ 240 mL vs. none was related to lower risk of renal stone disease (OR = 0.84, CI 0.71-0.99, p = 0.037). In another model, the associated risk of renal stone disease decreased significantly with tea consumption ≥ 20 cup-year (OR = 0.79, CI 0.66-0.94, p = 0.008), but not < 20 cup-year (OR = 0.92, CI 0.78-1.09, p = 0.34). Daily tea consumption ≥ 240 mL (two cups) was associated with a lower risk of renal stone disease. Tea consumption ≥ 20 cup-year also had a decreased associated risk of renal stone disease. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 22 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 23% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 9% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 12 | 55% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,539,088
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Urology
#1,501
of 2,117 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,283
of 327,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Urology
#44
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,117 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.