↓ Skip to main content

Coping with Forest Fragmentation: The Primates of Kibale National Park, Uganda

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Primatology, August 2000
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

wikipedia
2 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
302 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
407 Mendeley
Title
Coping with Forest Fragmentation: The Primates of Kibale National Park, Uganda
Published in
International Journal of Primatology, August 2000
DOI 10.1023/a:1005509119693
Authors

Daphne A. Onderdonk, Colin A. Chapman

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 407 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 13 3%
United States 5 1%
Germany 4 <1%
South Africa 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
India 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 4 <1%
Unknown 370 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 92 23%
Student > Master 75 18%
Researcher 68 17%
Student > Bachelor 42 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 24 6%
Other 63 15%
Unknown 43 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 225 55%
Environmental Science 75 18%
Social Sciences 17 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 12 3%
Psychology 8 2%
Other 21 5%
Unknown 49 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2018.
All research outputs
#8,534,528
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Primatology
#592
of 1,208 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,802
of 38,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Primatology
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,208 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them