| Title |
Pyrolysis Temperature-Dependent Changes in the Characteristics of Biochar-Borne Dissolved Organic Matter and Its Copper Binding Properties
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00128-018-2392-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jing Wei, Chen Tu, Guodong Yuan, Dongxue Bi, Hailong Wang, Lijuan Zhang, Benny K. G. Theng |
| Abstract |
The dissolved organic matter (DOM) samples from biochars produced from Jerusalem artichoke stalks by pyrolysis at 300, 500, and 700 °C were characterized using a combination of spectroscopic techniques. Additionally, the binding affinities (long KM) and the complexation capacities (CL) of the DOM samples with Cu(II) were calculated to assess their Cu binding properties. The biochar-borne DOM contained mainly humic-like components (C1-C3) with a small amount of a protein-like component (C4). As the charring temperature increased, the concentrations of released DOM decreased. The low temperature biochar-borne DOM was found to have more carboxyl groups than its high temperature counterparts, and thus it had larger CL values. In contrast, the high temperature biochar-borne DOM had larger long KM values. Low temperature biochars, if applied in a large quantity, would alter copper mobility in the environment because of their high DOM contents and large copper binding capacities. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 5% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 16 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 13 | 33% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 5% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 3% |
| Chemical Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 17 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2018.
All research outputs
#21,608,038
of 24,119,703 outputs
Outputs from Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#3,090
of 4,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#290,767
of 331,521 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Bulletin of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#24
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,119,703 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,112 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 331,521 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.