↓ Skip to main content

MPZL2 is a novel gene associated with autosomal recessive nonsyndromic moderate hearing loss

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
MPZL2 is a novel gene associated with autosomal recessive nonsyndromic moderate hearing loss
Published in
Human Genetics, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00439-018-1901-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Guney Bademci, Clemer Abad, Armagan Incesulu, Abolfazl Rad, Ozgul Alper, Susanne M. Kolb, Filiz B. Cengiz, Oscar Diaz-Horta, Fatma Silan, Ercan Mihci, Emre Ocak, Maryam Najafi, Reza Maroofian, Elanur Yilmaz, Banu G. Nur, Duygu Duman, Shengru Guo, David W. Sant, Gaofeng Wang, Paula V. Monje, Thomas Haaf, Susan H. Blanton, Barbara Vona, Katherina Walz, Mustafa Tekin

Abstract

While recent studies have revealed a substantial portion of the genes underlying human hearing loss, the extensive genetic landscape has not been completely explored. Here, we report a loss-of-function variant (c.72delA) in MPZL2 in three unrelated multiplex families from Turkey and Iran with autosomal recessive nonsyndromic hearing loss. The variant co-segregates with moderate sensorineural hearing loss in all three families. We show a shared haplotype flanking the variant in our families implicating a single founder. While rare in other populations, the allele frequency of the variant is ~ 0.004 in Ashkenazi Jews, suggesting that it may be an important cause of moderate hearing loss in that population. We show that Mpzl2 is expressed in mouse inner ear, and the protein localizes in the auditory inner and outer hair cells, with an asymmetric subcellular localization. We thus present MPZL2 as a novel gene associated with sensorineural hearing loss.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 5 14%
Other 5 14%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Master 3 8%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 10 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 19%
Unspecified 5 14%
Computer Science 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 13 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2018.
All research outputs
#14,419,368
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#2,448
of 2,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#185,999
of 327,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#15
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,963 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.