↓ Skip to main content

Does Electrification Spur the Fertility Transition? Evidence From Indonesia

Overview of attention for article published in Demography, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
2 policy sources
twitter
13 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
57 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
Title
Does Electrification Spur the Fertility Transition? Evidence From Indonesia
Published in
Demography, August 2015
DOI 10.1007/s13524-015-0420-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Michael Grimm, Robert Sparrow, Luca Tasciotti

Abstract

We analyze various pathways through which access to electricity affects fertility in Indonesia, using a district difference-in-difference approach. The electrification rate increased by 65 % over the study period, and our results suggest that the subsequent effects on fertility account for about 18 % to 24 % of the overall decline in fertility. A key channel is increased exposure to television. Using in addition several waves of Demographic and Health Surveys, we find suggestive evidence that increased exposure to TV affects, in particular, fertility preferences and increases the effective use of contraception. Reduced child mortality seems to be another important pathway.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Croatia 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 200 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 34 17%
Student > Bachelor 26 13%
Student > Master 23 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 6%
Other 36 18%
Unknown 56 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 45 22%
Social Sciences 43 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 3%
Psychology 5 2%
Other 25 12%
Unknown 64 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2022.
All research outputs
#2,245,459
of 25,559,053 outputs
Outputs from Demography
#597
of 2,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,796
of 279,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Demography
#5
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,559,053 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,008 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,354 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.