↓ Skip to main content

Lifespan-extending property of 6-shogaol from Zingiber officinale Roscoe in Caenorhabditis elegans

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Pharmacal Research, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
Title
Lifespan-extending property of 6-shogaol from Zingiber officinale Roscoe in Caenorhabditis elegans
Published in
Archives of Pharmacal Research, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12272-018-1052-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eun Byeol Lee, Jun Hyeong Kim, Yeong Jee Kim, Yun Jeong Noh, Su Jin Kim, In Hyun Hwang, Dae Keun Kim

Abstract

Aging is a key risk factor for many diseases, understanding the mechanism of which is becoming more important for drug development given the fast-growing aging population. In the course of our continued efforts to discover anti-aging natural products, the active constituent 6-shogaol was isolated from Zingiber officinale Roscoe. The chemical structure of 6-shogaol was identified by comparison of its NMR data with literature values. The lifespan-extending effect of 6-shogaol was observed in a dose-dependent manner in Caenorhabditis elegans that has been widely used as a model organism for human aging studies. Mechanism of such action was investigated using C. elegans models, suggesting that 6-shogaol is capable of increasing stress tolerances via enzyme induction. The proposed mechanism was further supported by observation of the increase in SOD and HSP expressions upon treatment with 6-shogaol in transgenic strains of C. elegans which contain GFP-based reporters. In addition, the mechanism was elaborated by confirming that the effect observed for 6-shogaol is independent from other aging-related factors that are known to affect the aging process of C. elegans.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 24%
Student > Bachelor 5 24%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 14%
Student > Postgraduate 2 10%
Lecturer 2 10%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 3 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 10%
Chemistry 2 10%
Other 3 14%
Unknown 4 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,539,088
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Pharmacal Research
#976
of 1,299 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#209,171
of 327,716 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Pharmacal Research
#5
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,299 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.3. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,716 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.