↓ Skip to main content

IFT88 mutations identified in individuals with non-syndromic recessive retinal degeneration result in abnormal ciliogenesis

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
IFT88 mutations identified in individuals with non-syndromic recessive retinal degeneration result in abnormal ciliogenesis
Published in
Human Genetics, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00439-018-1897-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anil Chekuri, Aditya A. Guru, Pooja Biswas, Kari Branham, Shyamanga Borooah, Angel Soto-Hermida, Michael Hicks, Naheed W. Khan, Hiroko Matsui, Akhila Alapati, Pongali B. Raghavendra, Susanne Roosing, Sripriya Sarangapani, Sinnakaruppan Mathavan, Amalio Telenti, John R. Heckenlively, S. Amer Riazuddin, Kelly A. Frazer, Paul A. Sieving, Radha Ayyagari

Abstract

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed to identify the variants responsible for inherited retinal degeneration (IRD) in a Caucasian family. Segregation analysis of selected rare variants with pathogenic potential identified a set of compound heterozygous changes p.Arg266*:c.796C>T and p.Ala568Thr:c.1702G>A in the intraflagellar transport protein-88 (IFT88) gene segregating with IRD. Expression of IFT88 with the p.Arg266* and p.Ala568Thr mutations in mIMDC3 cells by transient transfection and in HeLa cells by introducing the mutations using CRISPR-cas9 system suggested that both mutations result in the formation of abnormal ciliary structures. The introduction of the IFT88 p.Arg266* variant in the homozygous state in HeLa cells by CRISPR-Cas9 genome-editing revealed that the mutant transcript undergoes nonsense-mediated decay leading to a significant depletion of IFT88 transcript. Additionally, abnormal ciliogenesis was observed in these cells. These observations suggest that the rare and unique combination of IFT88 alleles observed in this study provide insight into the physiological role of IFT88 in humans and the likely mechanism underlying retinal pathology in the pedigree with IRD.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 6 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 18%
Researcher 5 15%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 6%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 9 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 7 21%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 18%
Unspecified 6 18%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,965,823
of 25,263,619 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#2,547
of 3,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#193,232
of 333,981 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#15
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,263,619 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,094 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 333,981 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.