↓ Skip to main content

Local and landscape effects on bee functional guilds in pigeon pea crops in Kenya

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Insect Conservation, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Local and landscape effects on bee functional guilds in pigeon pea crops in Kenya
Published in
Journal of Insect Conservation, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10841-015-9788-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Mark Otieno, C. Sheena Sidhu, Ben A. Woodcock, Andrew Wilby, Ioannis N. Vogiatzakis, Alice L. Mauchline, Mary W. Gikungu, Simon G. Potts

Abstract

It has been established that H+ secretion can be maintained in frog stomach in the absence of exogenous CO2 by using a nutrient bathing fluid containing 25 mM H2PO4 (pH approximately equal to 4.5) or by lowering the pH of a nonbuffered nutrient solution to about 3.0-3.6. Exogenous CO2 in the presence of these nutrient solutions uniformly caused a marked decrease in H+ secretion, PD, adn short-circuit current (Isc) and an increase in transmucosal resistance (R). Elevation of nutrient [k+] to 83 mM reduced R significantly but transiently without change in H+ when nutrient pH less than 5.0, whereas R returned to base line and H+ increased when nutrient pH greater than 5.0. Acidification of the nutrient medium in the presence of exogenous CO2 results in inhibition of the secretory pump, probably by decreasing intracellular pH, and also interferes with conductance at the nutrient membrane. Removal of exogenous CO2 from standard bicarbonate nutrient solution reduced by 50% the H+, PD, and Isc without change in R; K+-free nutrient solutions reverse these changes in Isc and PD but not in H+. The dropping PD and rising R induced by K+-free nutrient solutions in 5% CO2 - 95% O2 are returned toward normal by 100% O2. Our findings support an important role for exogenous CO2 in maintaining normal acid-base balance in frog mucosa by acting as an acidifying agent.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 91 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 19%
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 15%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Lecturer 3 3%
Other 15 16%
Unknown 20 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 44%
Environmental Science 17 18%
Engineering 2 2%
Unspecified 1 1%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 1%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 27 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2015.
All research outputs
#20,290,425
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Insect Conservation
#592
of 653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#219,216
of 262,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Insect Conservation
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.