↓ Skip to main content

An electrochemical immunoassay for the screening of celiac disease in saliva samples

Overview of attention for article published in Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
Title
An electrochemical immunoassay for the screening of celiac disease in saliva samples
Published in
Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry, July 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00216-015-8884-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gianluca Adornetto, Laura Fabiani, Giulia Volpe, Alessia De Stefano, Sonia Martini, Raffaella Nenna, Federica Lucantoni, Margherita Bonamico, Claudio Tiberti, Danila Moscone

Abstract

A highly sensitive electrochemical immunoassay for the initial diagnosis of celiac disease (CD) in saliva samples that overcomes the problems related to its high viscosity and to the low concentration of anti-transglutaminase antigen (tTG) IgA in this medium has been developed for the first time. The system uses magnetic beads (MBs) covered with tTG, which reacts with the anti-tTG IgA antibodies present in positive saliva samples. An anti-human IgA, conjugated with alkaline phosphate (AP) enzyme, was used as the label and a strip of eight magnetized screen-printed electrodes as the electrochemical transducer. In particular, two different immunoassay approaches were optimized and blindly compared to analyze a large number of saliva samples, whose anti-tTG IgA levels were independently determined by the radioimmunoassay (RIA) method. The obtained results, expressed as Ab index, were used to perform a diagnostic test evaluation through the construction of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. The approach, involving a pre-incubation between the anti-human IgA-AP and saliva samples prior to the addition of MBs-tTG, showed a cutoff of 0.022 with 95 % clinical sensitivity and 96 % clinical specificity. The area under the ROC curve is equal to 1, a result that classifies our test as "perfect." This study demonstrates that it is possible to perform the screening of CD with a rapid, simple, inexpensive, and sensitive method able to detect anti-tTG antibodies in saliva samples, which are easily obtained by non-invasive techniques. This aspect is of fundamental importance to screen a large number of subjects, especially in the pediatric age. Graphical Abstract ELIME assay Plus.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 4%
Unknown 27 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 18%
Researcher 5 18%
Other 4 14%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 9 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 7%
Engineering 2 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 4%
Other 5 18%
Unknown 10 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2015.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#7,542
of 9,619 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#235,968
of 276,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Analytical & Bioanalytical Chemistry
#75
of 191 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,619 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,422 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 191 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.