↓ Skip to main content

Hydrogen peroxide: a Jekyll and Hyde signalling molecule

Overview of attention for article published in Cell Death & Disease, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
472 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
559 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Hydrogen peroxide: a Jekyll and Hyde signalling molecule
Published in
Cell Death & Disease, October 2011
DOI 10.1038/cddis.2011.96
Pubmed ID
Authors

D R Gough, T G Cotter

Abstract

Reactive oxygen species (ROS) are a group of molecules produced in the cell through metabolism of oxygen. Endogenous ROS such as hydrogen peroxide (H₂O₂) have long been recognised as destructive molecules. The well-established roles they have in the phagosome and genomic instability has led to the characterisation of these molecules as non-specific agents of destruction. Interestingly, there is a growing body of literature suggesting a less sinister role for this Jekyll and Hyde molecule. It is now evident that at lower physiological levels, H₂O₂ can act as a classical intracellular signalling molecule regulating kinase-driven pathways. The newly discovered biological functions attributed to ROS include proliferation, migration, anoikis, survival and autophagy. Furthermore, recent advances in detection and quantification of ROS-family members have revealed that the diverse functions of ROS can be determined by the subcellular source, location and duration of these molecules within the cell. In light of this confounding paradox, we will examine the factors and circumstances that determine whether H₂O₂ acts in a pro-survival or deleterious manner.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 559 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Turkey 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 542 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 147 26%
Researcher 74 13%
Student > Master 74 13%
Student > Bachelor 47 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 30 5%
Other 77 14%
Unknown 110 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 161 29%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 92 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 38 7%
Chemistry 35 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 3%
Other 73 13%
Unknown 144 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2022.
All research outputs
#13,093,256
of 23,414,653 outputs
Outputs from Cell Death & Disease
#2,441
of 6,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,581
of 135,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cell Death & Disease
#9
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,414,653 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,636 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 135,391 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.