| Title |
The Influence of Screening on Outcomes of Clinically Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, February 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11605-018-3666-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
A.M. Dinaux, L.G.J. Leijssen, L.G. Bordeianou, H. Kunitake, D.L. Berger |
| Abstract |
Screening for colorectal cancer has resulted in declining incidence rates of both colon and rectal cancer and it may influence stage at presentation and improve survival. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of screening on patients diagnosed with locally advanced rectal cancer. A retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of patients who underwent neoadjuvant therapy and had an R0-resection for clinical AJCC stage II or stage III disease. All patients received surgery at a single center between 2004 and 2015. Patients diagnosed through screening were compared to patients diagnosed through symptomatic presentation. Three hundred nine patients were included, of whom 43 (13.9%) were diagnosed through screening. Screened patients had more often a white ethnicity, while there were no other differences in baseline characteristics or median household income. Screened patients had a lower rate of disease recurrence in addition to a longer disease free survival and overall survival. Patients with locally advanced rectal cancer diagnosed through screening demonstrated more favorable short and long-term outcomes than patients diagnosed through symptoms. Findings of this study reinforce the need for screening programs in addition to the need for research regarding optimization of screening adherence. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Libya | 1 | 25% |
| Turkey | 1 | 25% |
| Italy | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 10 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 1 | 10% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 50% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,755,393
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#1,373
of 2,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#250,024
of 451,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery
#22
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,489 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.