↓ Skip to main content

Shunt infections: a review and analysis of a personal series

Overview of attention for article published in Child's Nervous System, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Shunt infections: a review and analysis of a personal series
Published in
Child's Nervous System, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00381-018-3890-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Santosh Mohan Rao Kanangi, Chidambaram Balasubramaniam

Abstract

CSF diversion shunts are notoriously prone to complications. The most difficult to manage among them is shunt infection, which warrants a prolonged hospital stay. The aim of this paper is to review the pattern of infections, the pathology, and management of shunt infections with special reference to a tertiary pediatric center in a developing country. This is a review of shunt infections in general and a retrospective study of all cases operated in the hospital from 2000 to 2015. The authors analyze the data and try to discern patterns, which may enable newer interventions to treat as well as decrease the burden of shunt infections in the future. It is difficult to determine the true incidence of shunt infections as there is no definition of what constitutes a shunt infection. There are no standardized international guidelines as to how to deal with an infected shunt. Though the ability to treat shunt infection has improved and the incidence of shunt infection has decreased over time, there is still no consensus on the best way to manage it. The prevention is predominantly based on common sense and has helped but a more scientific algorithm is the need of the hour.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 4 12%
Researcher 3 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 6%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 4 12%
Unknown 16 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 36%
Neuroscience 1 3%
Energy 1 3%
Unknown 19 58%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 November 2020.
All research outputs
#14,477,435
of 25,513,063 outputs
Outputs from Child's Nervous System
#651
of 3,323 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#167,315
of 341,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child's Nervous System
#18
of 99 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,513,063 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,323 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,175 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 99 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.