| Title |
Genome-wide identification of m6A-associated SNPs as potential functional variants for bone mineral density
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Osteoporosis International, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00198-018-4573-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
X. B. Mo, Y. H. Zhang, S. F. Lei |
| Abstract |
This study investigated the effect of the N6-methyladenosine (m6A)-associated SNPs on bone mineral density (BMD) and found plenty of m6A-SNPs that were associated with BMD. This study increases our understanding on the regulation patterns of SNP and may provide new clues for further detection of functional mechanism underlying the associations between SNPs and osteoporosis. m6A plays critical roles in many fundamental biological processes and a variety of diseases. The m6A-associated SNPs may be potential functional variants for BMD. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of the genome-wide m6A-SNPs on BMD. We examined the association of m6A-SNPs with femoral neck (FN) and lumbar spine (LS) BMD in 32,961 individuals and quantitative heel ultrasounds (eBMD) in 142,487 individuals. Furthermore, we performed expression quantitative trait locus (eQTL) analyses for the m6A-SNPs using whole genome data of about 10.5 million SNPs and 21,323 mRNAs from 43 Chinese individuals, as well as public available data. Differential expression analyses were also performed to support the identified genes. We found 138, 125, and 993 m6A-SNPs which were associated with FN-BMD, LS-BMD, and eBMD (P < 0.05), respectively. The associations of rs11614913 (P = 8.92 × 10-10) in MIR196A2 and rs1110720 (P = 2.05 × 10-10) in ESPL1 with LS-BMD reached the genome-wide significance level. In addition, a total of 24 m6A-SNPs were significantly associated with eBMD (P < 5.0 × 10-8). Further eQTL analyses showed that 47 of these BMD-associated m6A-SNPs were associated with expressions of the 46 corresponding local genes. Moreover, the expressions of 26 of these genes were associated with BMD. The present study represents the first effort of investigating the associations and the mechanisms underlying the link between m6A-SNPs and BMD. The results suggested that m6A-SNP may play important roles in the pathology of osteoporosis. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 31% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 12% |
| Researcher | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 4% |
| Librarian | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 11 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2018.
All research outputs
#15,012,809
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#2,290
of 3,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#198,002
of 327,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#45
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,675 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.