↓ Skip to main content

Peer-led healthy lifestyle program in supportive housing: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in Trials, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
147 Mendeley
Title
Peer-led healthy lifestyle program in supportive housing: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial
Published in
Trials, September 2015
DOI 10.1186/s13063-015-0902-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leopoldo J. Cabassa, Ana Stefancic, Kathleen O’Hara, Nabila El-Bassel, Roberto Lewis-Fernández, José A. Luchsinger, Lauren Gates, Richard Younge, Melanie Wall, Lara Weinstein, Lawrence A. Palinkas

Abstract

The risk for obesity is twice as high in people with serious mental illness (SMI) compared to the general population. Racial and ethnic minority status contribute additional health risks. The aim of this study is to describe the protocol of a Hybrid Trial Type 1 design that will test the effectiveness and examine the implementation of a peer-led healthy lifestyle intervention in supportive housing agencies serving diverse clients with serious mental illness who are overweight or obese. The Hybrid Trial Type 1 design will combine a randomized effectiveness trial with a mixed-methods implementation study. The effectiveness trial will test the health impacts of a peer-led healthy lifestyle intervention versus usual care in supportive housing agencies. The healthy lifestyle intervention is derived from the Group Lifestyle Balanced Program, lasts 12 months, and will be delivered by trained peer specialists. Repeated assessments will be conducted at baseline and at 6, 12, and 18 months post randomization. A mixed-methods (e.g., structured interviews, focus groups, surveys) implementation study will be conducted to examine multi-level implementation factors and processes that can inform the use of the healthy lifestyle intervention in routine practice, using data from agency directors, program managers, staff, and peer specialists before, during, and after the implementation of the effectiveness trial. This paper describes the use of a hybrid research design that blends effectiveness trial methodologies and implementation science rarely used when studying the physical health of people with SMI and can serve as a model for integrating implementation science and health disparities research. Rigorously testing effectiveness and exploring the implementation process are both necessary steps to establish the evidence for large-scale delivery of peer-led healthy lifestyle intervention to improve the physical health of racial/ethnic minorities with SMI. www.clinicaltrials.gov ; NCT02175641 , registered 24 June 2014.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 147 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 146 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 21 14%
Student > Master 17 12%
Researcher 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 9%
Other 16 11%
Unknown 51 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 22 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 20 14%
Psychology 18 12%
Social Sciences 14 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 3%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 59 40%