↓ Skip to main content

Less pronounced response to exercise in healthy relatives to type 2 diabetic subjects compared with controls

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Physiology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (98th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
28 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Less pronounced response to exercise in healthy relatives to type 2 diabetic subjects compared with controls
Published in
Journal of Applied Physiology, September 2015
DOI 10.1152/japplphysiol.01067.2014
Pubmed ID
Authors

C. Ekman, T. Elgzyri, K. Ström, P. Almgren, H. Parikh, Marloes Dekker Nitert, T. Rönn, Fiona Manderson Koivula, C. Ling, Å. B. Tornberg, P. Wollmer, K. F. Eriksson, L. Groop, O. Hansson

Abstract

Healthy first-degree relatives with heredity of type 2 diabetes (FH+) are known to have metabolic inflexibility when compared to subjects without heredity for diabetes (FH-). In this study, we aimed to test the hypothesis that FH+ individuals have an impaired response to exercise compared to FH-. 16 FH+ and 19 FH- insulin sensitive men similar in age, VO2peak and BMI completed an exercise intervention with heart rate monitoration during exercise for 7 months. Before and after the exercise intervention, the participants underwent a physical examination, tests for glucose tolerance and exercise capacity and muscle biopsies were taken for expression analysis. The participants attended on average 39 training sessions during the intervention and spent 18.8 MJ on exercise. VO2peak/kg increased by 14% and the participants lost 1.2 kg of weight and 3 cm waist circumference. Given that the FH+ group expended 61% more energy during the intervention, we used regression analysis to analyze the response in the FH+ and FH- groups separately. Exercise volume had a significant effect on VO2peak, weight and waist circumference in the FH- group, but not in the FH+ group. After exercise, expression of genes involved in metabolism, oxidative phosphorylation and cellular respiration increased more in the FH-, compared to the FH+ group. This suggests that healthy, insulin sensitive FH+ and FH- participants with similar age, VO2peak and BMI may respond differently to an exercise intervention. The FH+ background might limit muscle adaptation to exercise, which may contribute to the increased susceptibility to type 2 diabetes in FH+ individuals.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 28 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 45 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 11%
Researcher 4 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 16 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 6 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Neuroscience 3 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Other 9 20%
Unknown 17 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 121. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 November 2020.
All research outputs
#350,755
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Physiology
#185
of 9,249 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,304
of 279,220 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Physiology
#1
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,249 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,220 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.