↓ Skip to main content

Why don't physicians adhere to guideline recommendations in practice? An analysis of barriers among Dutch general practitioners

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, August 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
376 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
362 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
Title
Why don't physicians adhere to guideline recommendations in practice? An analysis of barriers among Dutch general practitioners
Published in
Implementation Science, August 2009
DOI 10.1186/1748-5908-4-54
Pubmed ID
Authors

Marjolein Lugtenberg, Judith M Zegers-van Schaick, Gert P Westert, Jako S Burgers

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 362 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 7 2%
United States 5 1%
Canada 3 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Denmark 2 <1%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 335 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 71 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 16%
Researcher 41 11%
Other 22 6%
Student > Bachelor 22 6%
Other 69 19%
Unknown 79 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 148 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 31 9%
Psychology 19 5%
Social Sciences 18 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 3%
Other 44 12%
Unknown 91 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2023.
All research outputs
#4,292,717
of 23,520,142 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#830
of 1,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,105
of 113,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,520,142 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 113,428 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.