↓ Skip to main content

“Experiences of the burden of treatment”—Patient reports of facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin treatment in adults with immunodeficiency

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Clinical Nursing, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“Experiences of the burden of treatment”—Patient reports of facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin treatment in adults with immunodeficiency
Published in
Journal of Clinical Nursing, July 2018
DOI 10.1111/jocn.14580
Pubmed ID
Authors

Christina Petersson, Ramona Fust, Carina Hagstedt, Per Wågström, Åsa Nilsdotter‐Augustinsson

Abstract

To evaluate patient-reported experiences of facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin treatment in adults with primary or secondary immunodeficiency. Decreased levels of circulating antibodies (humoral immunodeficiency) are often associated with higher infection rates which cause problems in daily living, for example symptoms of severe and recurrent bacterial infections that may cause chronic lung diseases. For some diagnoses, treatment with immunoglobulin becomes critical and life-long. The acceptability of administration forms is important to achieve adherence to treatment, and to increase quality of life for these patients. Convergent mixed method approach. A structured telephone interview with nine questions evaluated on a score scale about treatment experience, satisfaction, and ancillary supplies was used, followed by open-ended questions for each item. Prohibiting factors were revealed, exemplified by problems due to technical issues and ancillary supply issues. Promoting factors was shown by high a satisfaction when combining treatment with daily life as well as increased wellbeing. Facilitated subcutaneous immunoglobulin treatment led to fewer treatment sessions, with a time-saving aspect also described by high scores in the item concerning longer treatment interval. The opportunity to be given the best possible treatment plan adjusted for each patients' situation is central. Healthcare professionals should discuss the different aspects that can promote and inhibit the outcomes of treatment. The results can help professionals to understand different factors that may impinge on the patients' everyday life when they are forced into a lifelong treatment regimen. This knowledge is also important for nurses who have a responsibility to promote health concerning patients with long-term conditions in general. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 32 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 5 16%
Librarian 3 9%
Lecturer 3 9%
Other 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 13 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 7 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 6%
Arts and Humanities 2 6%
Unspecified 1 3%
Other 4 13%
Unknown 12 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 July 2018.
All research outputs
#21,919,909
of 24,453,338 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#5,011
of 5,489 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#292,948
of 334,593 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Clinical Nursing
#146
of 159 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,453,338 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,489 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,593 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 159 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.