↓ Skip to main content

Alcohol use disorders

Overview of attention for article published in The Lancet, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
5 policy sources
twitter
71 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
288 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
454 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Alcohol use disorders
Published in
The Lancet, September 2015
DOI 10.1016/s0140-6736(15)00122-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jason P Connor, Paul S Haber, Wayne D Hall

Abstract

Alcohol use disorders are common in developed countries, where alcohol is cheap, readily available, and heavily promoted. Common, mild disorders often remit in young adulthood, but more severe disorders can become chronic and need long-term medical and psychological management. Doctors are uniquely placed to opportunistically assess and manage alcohol use disorders, but in practice diagnosis and treatment are often delayed. Brief behavioural intervention is effective in primary care for hazardous drinkers and individuals with mild disorders. Brief interventions could also encourage early entry to treatment for people with more-severe illness who are underdiagnosed and undertreated. Sustained abstinence is the optimum outcome for severe disorder. The stigma that discourages treatment seeking needs to be reduced, and pragmatic approaches adopted for patients who initially reject abstinence as a goal. To engage people in one or more psychological and pharmacological treatments of equivalent effectiveness is more important than to advocate a specific treatment. A key research priority is to improve the diagnosis and treatment of most affected people who have comorbid mental and other drug use disorders.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 71 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 454 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 449 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 66 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 56 12%
Student > Bachelor 56 12%
Researcher 46 10%
Student > Postgraduate 32 7%
Other 83 18%
Unknown 115 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 136 30%
Psychology 72 16%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 5%
Social Sciences 18 4%
Neuroscience 18 4%
Other 63 14%
Unknown 126 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 81. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2024.
All research outputs
#535,321
of 25,660,026 outputs
Outputs from The Lancet
#4,892
of 42,903 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,833
of 277,540 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Lancet
#92
of 462 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,660,026 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 42,903 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 67.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,540 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 462 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.