You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Fungal degradation of coal as a pretreatment for methane production
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Fuel, February 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.fuel.2012.05.015 |
| Authors |
Rizwan Haider, Muhammad A. Ghauri, John R. SanFilipo, Elizabeth J. Jones, William H. Orem, Calin A. Tatu, Kalsoom Akhtar, Nasrin Akhtar |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Canada | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 41 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 33% |
| Researcher | 9 | 21% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 12% |
| Unknown | 3 | 7% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 16% |
| Environmental Science | 7 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 14% |
| Engineering | 4 | 9% |
| Energy | 4 | 9% |
| Other | 9 | 21% |
| Unknown | 6 | 14% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 October 2022.
All research outputs
#2,645,665
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Fuel
#132
of 3,582 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,904
of 291,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Fuel
#1
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,582 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.