↓ Skip to main content

Inhibition of the Arg/N-end rule pathway-mediated proteolysis by dipeptide-mimetic molecules

Overview of attention for article published in Amino Acids, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Inhibition of the Arg/N-end rule pathway-mediated proteolysis by dipeptide-mimetic molecules
Published in
Amino Acids, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00726-015-2083-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kenji Kitamura

Abstract

Ubr11 in the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe is an evolutionarily conserved ubiquitin ligase functioning in the Arg/N-end rule pathway, which promotes degradation of substrate proteins via the proteasome. Ubr11 recognizes the N-degron sequence in substrates. The primary N-degron contains a destabilization-inducing N-terminal amino acid, which is either a basic (type 1) or bulky hydrophobic (type 2) residue. Dipeptides are known to inhibit proteolytic degradation via the Arg/N-end rule pathway. Here, I examined the potency of some amino acid- or dipeptide-related molecules in their inhibition of Ubr11/N-end rule-mediated degradation. An amide form of L-arginine and L-tryptophan had weak inhibitory activity for type 1 and type 2 substrates, respectively, although the unmodified amino acid monomer and its carboxymethylated ester were ineffective. Among the naturally occurring dipeptides tested, Lys-Leu and Tyr-Leu showed potent inhibitory activity, but their effect was transient, especially at submillimolar concentrations. L-arginine-β-naphthylamide (Arg-βNA) showed stronger activity than several dipeptides for type 1 substrates, but all Lys-Leu, Tyr-Leu, and Arg-βNA caused growth retardation. The inhibitory activity of the L-phenylalanine carbobenzoxy-hydrazide for type 2 substrates was not very strong, but it prolonged the action of Tyr-Leu at low concentrations and, importantly, did not interfere with cell growth. Apart from their utility, these dipeptidomimetics provide a clue for understanding the determinants of recognition by Ubr ubiquitin ligase and further designing novel inhibitors of the Arg/N-end rule pathway.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Student > Bachelor 2 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 17%
Researcher 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 67%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 September 2015.
All research outputs
#15,294,575
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from Amino Acids
#1,011
of 1,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#155,804
of 266,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amino Acids
#22
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.