↓ Skip to main content

Optimization of oncocin for antibacterial activity using a SPOT synthesis approach: extending the pathogen spectrum to Staphylococcus aureus

Overview of attention for article published in Amino Acids, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Optimization of oncocin for antibacterial activity using a SPOT synthesis approach: extending the pathogen spectrum to Staphylococcus aureus
Published in
Amino Acids, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00726-015-2082-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Knappe, Serge Ruden, Stefanie Langanke, Tarun Tikkoo, Jennifer Ritzer, Ralf Mikut, Lisandra L. Martin, Ralf Hoffmann, Kai Hilpert

Abstract

The identification of lead molecules against multidrug-resistant bacteria ensuing the development of novel antimicrobial drugs is an urgent task. Proline-rich antimicrobial peptides are highly active in vitro and in vivo, but only against a few Gram-negative human pathogens, with rather weak activities against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. This reduced level of efficacy could be related to inadequate uptake mechanisms or structural differences of the intracellular target proteins, i.e., the 70S ribosome or chaperone DnaK. Here we synthesized peptide arrays on cellulose membranes using cleavable linkers to release the free individual peptides for further antimicrobial tests. Thus, a library of singly substituted oncocin analogs was produced by replacing each residue by all other 19 canonical amino acids yielding a set of 361 individual peptides to be evaluated against a luminescent P. aeruginosa strain. Thirteen substitutions appeared promising and their improved antibacterial activities were confirmed for different bacteria after larger scale synthesis of these analogs. By combining two favorable substitutions into one peptide, we finally obtained an oncocin analog that was ten times more active against P. aeruginosa and even 100-fold more active against S. aureus than the original oncocin, providing minimal inhibitory concentrations of 4-8 and 0.5 µg/mL, respectively.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 27%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 11%
Professor 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 16%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 24%
Chemistry 7 19%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 8%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 9 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2015.
All research outputs
#14,824,070
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from Amino Acids
#982
of 1,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#147,534
of 266,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Amino Acids
#20
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.7. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 266,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.