| Title |
Atlas of the muscle motor points for the lower limb: implications for electrical stimulation procedures and electrode positioning
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
European Journal of Applied Physiology, July 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00421-011-2093-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Alberto Botter, Gianmosè Oprandi, Fabio Lanfranco, Stefano Allasia, Nicola A. Maffiuletti, Marco Alessandro Minetto |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 36% |
| Slovenia | 1 | 9% |
| France | 1 | 9% |
| Germany | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 64% |
| Scientists | 3 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 9% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 360 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | <1% |
| Japan | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Norway | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 349 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 52 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 47 | 13% |
| Researcher | 46 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 44 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 76 | 21% |
| Unknown | 76 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 85 | 24% |
| Engineering | 57 | 16% |
| Sports and Recreations | 45 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 23 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 19 | 5% |
| Other | 36 | 10% |
| Unknown | 95 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,754,584
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#875
of 4,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,330
of 130,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Applied Physiology
#14
of 64 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,345 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 64 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.