You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
井上順孝責任編集・宗教情報リサーチセンター編, 『情報時代のオウム真理教』, 春秋社, 二〇一一年七月刊, A5判, 四三七+xxvi頁, 三六〇〇円+税
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of religious studies, June 2012
|
| DOI | 10.20716/rsjars.86.1_168 |
| Authors |
櫻井 義秀 |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 5 | 25% |
| Unknown | 15 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 20 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 July 2018.
All research outputs
#2,671,103
of 25,571,620 outputs
Outputs from Journal of religious studies
#11
of 290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,584
of 179,522 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of religious studies
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,571,620 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 290 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,522 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them