↓ Skip to main content

Red yeasts and carotenoid production: outlining a future for non-conventional yeasts of biotechnological interest

Overview of attention for article published in World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
Red yeasts and carotenoid production: outlining a future for non-conventional yeasts of biotechnological interest
Published in
World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11274-015-1927-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ilaria Mannazzu, Sara Landolfo, Teresa Lopes da Silva, Pietro Buzzini

Abstract

Carotenoids are one of the most common classes of pigments that occur in nature. Due to their biological properties, they are widely used in phytomedicine and in the chemical, pharmaceutical, cosmetic, food and feed industries. Accordingly, their global market is continuously growing, and it is expected to reach about US$1.4 billion in 2018. Carotenoids can be easily produced by chemical synthesis, although their biotechnological production is rapidly becoming an appealing alternative to the chemical route, partly due to consumer concerns against synthetic pigments. Among the yeasts, and apart from the pigmented species Phaffia rhodozyma (and its teleomorph Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous), a handful of species of the genera Rhodosporidium, Rhodotorula, Sporobolomyces and Sporidiobolus are well known carotenoid producers. These are known as 'red yeasts', and their ability to synthesize mixtures of carotenoids from low-cost carbon sources has been broadly studied recently. Here, in agreement with the renewed interest in microbial carotenoids, the recent literature is reviewed regarding the taxonomy of the genera Rhodosporidium, Rhodotorula, Sporobolomyces and Sporidiobolus, the stress factors that influence their carotenogenesis, and the most advanced analytical tools for evaluation of carotenoid production. Moreover, a synopsis of the molecular and "-omic" tools available for elucidation of the metabolic pathways of the microbial carotenoids is reported.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Czechia 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 154 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 27 17%
Student > Master 21 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 38 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 27%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 29 19%
Engineering 9 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 7 4%
Chemistry 6 4%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 50 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2015.
All research outputs
#21,420,714
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
#1,398
of 1,757 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#230,790
of 270,326 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology
#26
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,757 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 270,326 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.