↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of a reducible disulfide linker for siderophore-mediated delivery of antibiotics

Overview of attention for article published in JBIC Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
40 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
75 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of a reducible disulfide linker for siderophore-mediated delivery of antibiotics
Published in
JBIC Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00775-018-1588-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Wilma Neumann, Elizabeth M. Nolan

Abstract

Bacterial iron uptake machinery can be hijacked for the targeted delivery of antibiotics into pathogens by attaching antibiotics to siderophores, iron chelators that are employed by bacteria to obtain this essential nutrient. We synthesized and evaluated Ent-SS-Cipro, a siderophore-antibiotic conjugate comprised of the triscatecholate siderophore enterobactin and the fluoroquinolone antibiotic ciprofloxacin that contains a self-immolative disulfide linker. This linker is designed to be cleaved after uptake into the reducing environment of the bacterial cytoplasm. We show that the disulfide bond of Ent-SS-Cipro is cleaved by reducing agents, including the cellular reductant glutathione, which results in release of the unmodified fluoroquinolone antibiotic. Antibacterial activity assays against a panel of Escherichia coli show that Ent-SS-Cipro exhibits activity against some, but not all, E. coli. This work informs the design of siderophore-antibiotic conjugates, particularly those carrying antibiotics with cytoplasmic targets that require release after uptake into bacterial cells, and indicates that disulfide linkers may not be generally applicable for conjugation strategies of antibiotics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 75 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 75 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 17%
Researcher 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 9%
Student > Master 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 7%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 25 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 24 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 7%
Engineering 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 3 4%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 29 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2019.
All research outputs
#7,270,611
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from JBIC Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry
#168
of 664 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,230
of 329,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JBIC Journal of Biological Inorganic Chemistry
#3
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 664 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.