↓ Skip to main content

Lumbar disk herniation during pregnancy: a review on general management and timing of surgery

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Neurochirurgica, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
Title
Lumbar disk herniation during pregnancy: a review on general management and timing of surgery
Published in
Acta Neurochirurgica, January 2017
DOI 10.1007/s00701-017-3098-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hugo Ardaillon, Yosef Laviv, Jeffrey E. Arle, Ekkehard M. Kasper

Abstract

Narrative review with case illustration. Provide an overview of existing management strategies to suggest a guideline for surgical management of lumbar disk herniation in pregnant women based on time of presentation. We performed a narrative review on the topic using the PubMed database. A total of 63 relevant articles published after 1992 were identified, of which 17 fulfilled selection criteria. A total of 22 published cases of spine surgery for disk herniation during pregnancy were found in 17 studies on the topic. Prone positioning was reported in the majority of cases during the first and early second trimester. C-sections were performed prior to spine surgery in the prone position for the majority of patients operated during the third trimester. The left lateral position with continued pregnancy was preferred during the latter half of the second trimester when delivery of the fetus cannot yet be performed but surgery is indicated. Spine surgery during pregnancy is a rare scenario but can be performed safely when needed if providers adhere to general guidelines. Surgical approaches and overall management are influenced by the stage of pregnancy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 9 15%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 8%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 17 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 7%
Neuroscience 4 7%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 2 3%
Unknown 21 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 July 2018.
All research outputs
#18,641,800
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Acta Neurochirurgica
#1,549
of 1,940 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#311,187
of 420,772 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Neurochirurgica
#19
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,940 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 420,772 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.