↓ Skip to main content

The Role of Nutrition in Cognitive Function and Brain Ageing in the Elderly

Overview of attention for article published in Current Nutrition Reports, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
53 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
Title
The Role of Nutrition in Cognitive Function and Brain Ageing in the Elderly
Published in
Current Nutrition Reports, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s13668-018-0229-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Samantha L. Gardener, Stephanie R. Rainey-Smith

Abstract

The purposes of this review were to examine literature published over the last 5 years and to evaluate the role of nutrition in cognitive function and brain ageing, focussing on the Mediterranean diet (MeDi), Dietary Approaches to Stop Hypertension (DASH), and Mediterranean-DASH Intervention for Neurodegenerative Delay (MIND) diets. Results suggest that higher adherence to a healthy dietary pattern is associated with preservation of brain structure and function as well as slower cognitive decline, with the MIND diet substantially slowing cognitive decline, over and above the MeDi and DASH diets. Whilst results to-date suggest adherence to a healthy diet, such as the MeDi, DASH, or MIND, is an important modifiable risk factor in the quest to develop strategies aimed at increasing likelihood of healthy brain ageing, further work is required to develop dietary guidelines with the greatest potential benefit for public health; a research topic of increasing importance as the world's population ages.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 163 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 15%
Student > Bachelor 22 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Student > Postgraduate 7 4%
Other 25 15%
Unknown 58 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 22 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 13%
Psychology 9 6%
Neuroscience 9 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 64 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2018.
All research outputs
#2,411,674
of 23,094,276 outputs
Outputs from Current Nutrition Reports
#98
of 335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,868
of 327,552 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Nutrition Reports
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,094,276 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,552 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.