↓ Skip to main content

Effect of Mouthguards on Head Responses and Mandible Forces in Football Helmet Impacts

Overview of attention for article published in Annals of Biomedical Engineering, October 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
111 Mendeley
Title
Effect of Mouthguards on Head Responses and Mandible Forces in Football Helmet Impacts
Published in
Annals of Biomedical Engineering, October 2011
DOI 10.1007/s10439-011-0399-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

David C. Viano, Chris Withnall, Michael Wonnacott

Abstract

The potential for mouthguards to change the risk of concussion was studied in football helmet impacts. The Hybrid III head was modified with an articulating mandible, dentition, and compliant temporomandibular joints (TMJ). It was instrumented for triaxial head acceleration and triaxial force at the TMJs and upper dentition. Mandible force and displacement were validated against cadaver impacts to the chin. In phase 1, one of five mouthguards significantly lowered HIC in 6.7 m/s impacts (p = 0.025) from the no mouthguard condition but not in 9.5 m/s tests. In phase 2, eight mouthguards increased HIC from +1 to +17% in facemask impacts that loaded the chinstraps and mandible; one was statistically higher (p = 0.018). Peak head acceleration was +1 to +15% higher with six mouthguards and 2-3% lower with two others. The differences were not statistically significant. Five of eight mouthguards significantly reduced forces on the upper dentition by 40.8-63.9%. Mouthguards tested in this study with the Hybrid III articulating mandible lowered forces on the dentition and TMJ, but generally did not influence HIC or concussion risks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 111 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 14%
Student > Master 15 14%
Researcher 11 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 8%
Other 25 23%
Unknown 17 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 29 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 7%
Sports and Recreations 8 7%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 10 9%
Unknown 27 24%