↓ Skip to main content

A qualitative study of factors influencing retention of doctors and nurses at rural healthcare facilities in Bangladesh

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, August 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
69 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
297 Mendeley
Title
A qualitative study of factors influencing retention of doctors and nurses at rural healthcare facilities in Bangladesh
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, August 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12913-015-1012-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Emmanuel Kwame Darkwa, M. Sophia Newman, Mahmud Kawkab, Mahbub Elahi Chowdhury

Abstract

Bangladesh is a highly populous country with three-quarters rural population. Pressing national shortages in health professionals has resulted in high vacancy rates in rural areas. These are compounded by excessive absenteeism and low retention among nurses and doctors posted to rural locations. This study attempts to ascertain reasons for providers' reluctance to work in rural and remote areas and to identify ways in which these barriers to appropriate staffing might be resolved. This is a qualitative study based on in-depth interviews with healthcare providers (n = 15) and facility managers (n = 4) posted in rural areas, and key informant interviews with health policymakers at the national level (n = 2). Interview guides were written in English and translated and administered in Bengali. The collected data were re-translated and analyzed in English. Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis approach (data familiarization, coding, identifying and reviewing themes, and producing a final report) was used. Participants reported poor living conditions in rural areas (e.g., poor housing facilities and unsafe drinking water); overwhelming workloads with poor safety and insufficient equipment; and a lack of opportunities for career development, and skill enhancement. They reported insufficient wages and inadequate opportunities for private practice in rural areas. Managers described their lack of sufficient authority to undertake disciplinary measures for absenteeism. They also pointed at the lack of fairness in promotion practices of the providers. Policymakers acknowledged unavailability or insufficient allowances for rural postings. There is also a lack of national policy on rural retention. The findings revealed a complex interplay of factors influencing doctors' and nurses' availability in rural and remote public health facilities from the perspective of different players in the healthcare delivery system of Bangladesh. In addition, the study generated several possibilities for improvement, including increased allowances and incentives for rural posting; a transparent and fair promotion system for serving in rural areas; enhanced authority of the local managers for reducing worker absenteeism; and improved national policies on rural retention.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Bangladesh 2 <1%
Pakistan 1 <1%
Peru 1 <1%
Unknown 293 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 59 20%
Lecturer 34 11%
Researcher 27 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 7%
Student > Bachelor 20 7%
Other 61 21%
Unknown 74 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 76 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 62 21%
Social Sciences 21 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 17 6%
Unspecified 10 3%
Other 33 11%
Unknown 78 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 October 2021.
All research outputs
#6,711,336
of 25,307,332 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#3,136
of 8,602 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,681
of 274,124 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#42
of 150 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,307,332 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 8,602 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,124 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 150 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.