You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Discussion on the Activity Origin in Metal‐Free Nitrogen‐Doped Carbons For Oxygen Reduction Reaction and their Mechanisms
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
ChemSusChem, September 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1002/cssc.201500373 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kuang-Hsu Wu, Da-Wei Wang, Dang-Sheng Su, Ian R Gentle |
| Abstract |
The origin of oxygen reduction reaction activity in metal-free N-doped carbons has been a stimulating, yet unsolved issue for the rational design of cost-effective electrocatalysts for fuel cells and metal-air batteries. At present, there are several inconsistent opinions on the materials chemistry and the mechanism of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) performed on this type of materials. This article provides a brief review of the current understanding of ORR processes and the history of electrocatalyst development. With special attention, the focus of the discussion is on the major contentions of the current opinions towards metal-free N-doped carbon chemistry and the arguments for the probable ORR mechanisms. By clarifying the fundamental aspects of each opinion, a converging consensus on N-doped carbon electrocatalysts can be established and thus facilitate the substantial development of large-capacity energy devices. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 96 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Philippines | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 93 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 23% |
| Researcher | 17 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 14 | 15% |
| Unknown | 21 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 33 | 34% |
| Chemical Engineering | 12 | 13% |
| Materials Science | 11 | 11% |
| Engineering | 7 | 7% |
| Energy | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 27 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 September 2015.
All research outputs
#21,885,607
of 24,417,958 outputs
Outputs from ChemSusChem
#3,936
of 5,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,295
of 271,706 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ChemSusChem
#73
of 112 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,417,958 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,585 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,706 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 112 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.