| Title |
Inverting the patient involvement paradigm: defining patient led research
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Research Involvement and Engagement, July 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s40900-018-0104-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Laura B. Mader, Tess Harris, Sabine Kläger, Ian B. Wilkinson, Thomas F. Hiemstra |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 113 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 43 | 38% |
| Canada | 15 | 13% |
| United States | 7 | 6% |
| Australia | 6 | 5% |
| Belgium | 2 | 2% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Democratic People's Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 32 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 74 | 65% |
| Scientists | 31 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 5% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 79 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 24 | 30% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 8 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 23% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 23% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 15% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 5 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 17 | 22% |
| Unknown | 19 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#474,950
of 25,724,500 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#17
of 519 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,050
of 340,368 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,724,500 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 519 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,368 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them