↓ Skip to main content

Mesonia sediminis sp. nov., isolated from a sea cucumber culture pond

Overview of attention for article published in Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (74th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
11 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
Mesonia sediminis sp. nov., isolated from a sea cucumber culture pond
Published in
Antonie van Leeuwenhoek, September 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10482-015-0575-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Feng-Qing Wang, Zhi-Hong Xie, Jin-Xin Zhao, Guan-Jun Chen, Zong-Jun Du

Abstract

A yellow-pigmented, Gram-stain negative and facultatively anaerobic bacterium, designated MF326(T), was isolated from a sample of sediment collected from a sea cucumber culture pond in Rongcheng, China (122°14'34″E 36°54'36″N). Cells of strain MF326(T) were found to be catalase negative and oxidase positive. Optimal growth was found to occur at 30 °C and pH 7.0-7.5 in the presence of 2.0-3.0 % (w/v) NaCl. Phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA gene sequences revealed that strain MF326(T) is a member of the genus Mesonia and exhibits the high sequence similarity (94.3 %) with the type strain of Mesonia ostreae, followed by Mesonia algae (93.9 %). The dominant fatty acids of strain MF326(T) were identified as iso-C15:0, an unidentified fatty acid with an equivalent chain-length of 13.565 and anteiso-C15:0. The major polar lipids were found to be two unidentified lipids and phosphatidylethanolamine. The major respiratory quinone was found to be MK-6 and the genomic DNA G+C content was determined to be 40.7 mol%. On the basis of the phylogenetic analysis and differential phenotypic characteristics, it is concluded that strain MF326(T) (=KCTC 42255(T) =MCCC 1H00125(T)) should be assigned to the genus Mesonia as the type strain of a novel species, for which the name Mesonia sediminis sp. nov. is proposed.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 33%
Researcher 2 33%
Other 1 17%
Student > Master 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 50%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 33%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2021.
All research outputs
#7,222,086
of 22,826,360 outputs
Outputs from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#469
of 2,027 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,059
of 267,081 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Antonie van Leeuwenhoek
#7
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,826,360 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,027 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,081 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.