↓ Skip to main content

Stem cells are the most sensitive screening tool to identify toxicity of GATA4-targeted novel small-molecule compounds

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Toxicology, July 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (62nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
Title
Stem cells are the most sensitive screening tool to identify toxicity of GATA4-targeted novel small-molecule compounds
Published in
Archives of Toxicology, July 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00204-018-2257-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

S. Tuuli Karhu, Mika J. Välimäki, Mikael Jumppanen, Sini M. Kinnunen, Lotta Pohjolainen, Robert S. Leigh, Samuli Auno, Gábor Földes, Gustav Boije af Gennäs, Jari Yli-Kauhaluoma, Heikki Ruskoaho, Virpi Talman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 16%
Student > Bachelor 5 14%
Researcher 5 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 11 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 9 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Environmental Science 1 3%
Other 5 14%
Unknown 12 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 November 2019.
All research outputs
#8,155,476
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Toxicology
#1,019
of 2,835 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,466
of 341,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Toxicology
#11
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,835 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.