| Title |
Ethics, Finance, and Automation: A Preliminary Survey of Problems in High Frequency Trading
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science and Engineering Ethics, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11948-012-9412-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Davis, Andrew Kumiega, Ben Van Vliet |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Indonesia | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 67 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 17% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Researcher | 8 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Unknown | 17 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Computer Science | 17 | 24% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 13 | 19% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 5 | 7% |
| Social Sciences | 5 | 7% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 February 2017.
All research outputs
#4,469,784
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Science and Engineering Ethics
#337
of 947 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#32,287
of 184,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science and Engineering Ethics
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 947 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 184,995 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.